Kaye Richard – When I Write I'm Right

US political and social commentary
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Kaye Richard
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Low Information Voters

Posted on March 31, 2013 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

“It’s not that our liberal friends are ignorant, it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”  –  Ronald Reagan

When Reagan referred to “our liberal friends” he identified a segment of seriously misguided, under informed, self centered voters who make bad decisions in the voting booth.  Today they’re increasingly known as low information voters.

How big is their impact?   Last November over 61 million low information voters granted President Barack Kevorkian, four more years to practice voodoo medicine on their terminally ill economy.  Clearly these Einsteins aren’t troubled by obscene debt and deficit numbers or painfully high unemployment.

Typically left of center, low information voters actually know very little about the issues but see their limited knowledge as encyclopedic.  Health care is a good example.

LI voters almost achieve orgasm over ObamaCare yet few can explain, for example, the medical device tax and why this jobs killer is considered by the industry to be anti-technology.  Explain it?  They’ve never even heard of it.

Low information voters were willingly hoodwinked by the presidential canard that insuring another 30 million Americans under ObamaCare could be accomplished without increasing costs.  That claim defies even simple logic but the President poured the Kool-Aid and the sycophants drank it.  Now let’s see these nanny state proponents explain the Society of Actuaries (SAC) just released numbers showing a 32% cost increase for claims on individual health policies under ObamaCare.

Insurance rates are based on costs.  That 32% will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher premiums.  According to President Obama, costs were to go down under the Affordable Care Act, but the SAC report predicts double digit increases in most states.  It outlines examples of higher costs by 2017 for individual coverage of 62% in California, 80% for Ohio & Wisconsin, over 20 % in Florida and 67% in Maryland.  Oops!  Up doesn’t seem like down to me.

Ask the low information voter to explain the rising numbers of private practise doctors closing up shop because they can’t cover expenses under reduced Medicare payouts.

Dr. Mark Seigel, Associate Professor of Medicine at New York University School of Medicine, says a cardiologist who made $560 to read an echocardiogram will make $280 under ObamaCare.  Sound like a good deal?  Of course not, but when you’re addicted to the government teat, you tend not to sweat little things like how nothing is free or that government must first take before it can give.  Low information voters never dig that deep.

Gay marriage and gun control are the latest causes spurring LI voters to action through emotion without knowledge.  Pandering politicians mixed with media angst and hysteria quickly coalesced low information voters in a bellicose call to action on both fronts.

Telling the Deity He got it wrong on marriage and restricting rights to self-protection are not positions born of brilliance.

Last November’s presidential election revealed a troubling reality.  Over 51% of voters thought it smarter not to reject failure but to embrace it.

That speaks directly to the intelligence quotient level of the low information voter.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged Affordable Health Care Act, Health care costs rising, Low information voter, Obama lies, Obamacare, Ronald Reagan | 5 Comments

Zogby Poll – There Is A Ryan Bump

Posted on August 15, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

Mitt Romney’s choice of Paul Ryan as his VP running mate turned out to be a brilliant decision.  Ask any of the estimated 10,000 thrilled supporters who attended Ryan’s return to his native Wisconsin on Sunday.  The new candidate was so moved by the enthusiasm of the throngs that he showed a moment of grateful emotion. 

Within hours of Saturday’s announcement, renewed hope was felt by many previously disappointed with Gov. Romney.  His failure to be more forthcoming on plans to reverse the Obamanation of America won him no friends.

By Monday the pulse of a cross section of voters was taken.   Top pollster John Zogby (JZ Analytics), showed Romney/Ryan and Obama/Biden tied at 46%, an impressive bump up for team Romney.  Just days earlier many polls had President Obama ahead by 5 percentage points.

A nationwide phone survey conducted by Scott Rasmussen (Rasmussen Reports), put Paul Ryan’s favorable numbers at 50% of likely voters up from 39% before winning the VP nomination.  The poll further found over half (29%) of the 50% view Ryan as Very Favorable.

The Wisconsin congressman was certainly the right choice from a strong field of contenders.   At 42, the handsome, athletic, Tea Party favorite brings hope to those who were reticent to get behind presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney.  On personality alone he scores points over the less exciting former governor.  The two men like and respect each other which makes business savvy Romney more likely to listen to the politically intuitive congressman.

Ryan is the only candidate who can talk about America’s problems, offer sound solutions and do so without sounding partisan.  He has that rare ability to present himself as any other hard working, deeply concerned American who foresees the future under a second Obama term.  What stares back at Ryan and all patriotic Americans is the demise, by design, of a once great nation.

The Miami University (Ohio) graduate and married father of three brings a wealth of experience to the ticket.  He has ably represented Wisconsin’s 1st congressional district for thirteen years and maintains his position as Chairman of the House Budget Committee.  His political experience includes time as a senatorial aide, legislative director and a speech writer for former vice presidential nominee Jack Kemp (NY).

Ryan’s focus with the House Budget Committee is on privatizing Social Security to prevent insolvency, introducing a voucher program to replace Medicare (for those 55 and under) and making the states responsible for Medicaid and food stamps funded by block grants from the feds.

Paul Ryan describes himself as, “as pro-life as a person gets.”  He opposes same sex marriage and would impose criminal penalty on doctors who perform partial birth abortions. 

A strong defender of gun rights, Congressman Ryan believes in a licensed gun owner’s right to carry/conceal in every state if licensed in one state.  He would ban flag burning, end federal funding of National Public Radio and he supports energy self-sufficiency for America.

As a devout Catholic, Paul Ryan believes in values that strengthen the family.  As a strong conservative he believes in ideas that will strengthen the country. 

Together Mitt Romney & Paul Ryan have a message.  There is no better time than now to deliver it.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged Paul Ryan, politics, pollster john zogby, Presidential election, rasmussen reports, Romney leads Obama, US election 2012, Vice Presidential nominee | 2 Comments

Tolerance For Everyone But Conservative Christians

Posted on August 5, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

Dan Cathy is everything the left despises.  He owns a business, became successful without government assistance and he’s a conservative Christian.  What’s not to hate?

Cathy, the owner and CEO of the hugely popular Chick-fil-A restaurant chain, faced boycotts and ongoing controversy for expressing his firmly held beliefs.  When asked during an interview with the Baptist Press about his company’s position on marriage and family, Mr. Cathy responded, “Well, guilty as charged. We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit.”

Nowhere in his comments did Dan Cathy mention gays.

Without meaning to, Cathy upped the ante in a subsequent radio interview saying, “I think we are inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, ‘We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.”

What followed Cathy’s honesty was the most hate filled, duplicitous rant from the apoplectic left, the same holier than thou crowd who constantly lecture the right on tolerance, acceptance and diversity of opinion.  Not practicing what they preach, the politically correct goons tore into the Chick-fil-A CEO like he was the Special of the Day.

Former Obama White House Chief-of-Staff, now Mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, claimed “Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago’s values.”  This is the same Rahm Emanuel who sought the help of controversial Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan in the same Chicago that recorded 49 murders in July.   Emanuel hopes the anti-Semitic Farrakhan can help fight the violent crime wave now plaguing the Windy City.  Go figure.

Boston Mayor Tom Menino was so angered by Cathy’s moral position that he sent the company a letter making it clear he does not want them in Boston.  He claimed Dan Cathy’s statements were “prejudiced.”   If only Cathy had supported abortion rights or gun control.  Mayor Menino might have rolled out the red carpet had the restaurant chain’s CEO just understood – you have to go along to get along.

Many from the left slammed Dan Cathy calling him hateful and vowed to hurt his company financially.  In response, former Arkansas Gov., one time presidential hopeful and Baptist minister Mike Huckabee, took to his website promoting Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day.  Supporters turned out in droves giving the chicken eatery its biggest day of sales ever.  A counter “Kiss-In” by gays & lesbians fizzled. 

The left’s effort to financially hurt Chick-fil-A failed but no one should ignore the intent of those in public office to damage a business over a spiritual belief, one that is a cornerstone of all mainstream religions.  

That should be very concerning to anyone who genuinely believes in free speech. 

Who will be next on the hit list?  Will a paving company be denied a government contract because of a politically incorrect viewpoint?  Personal beliefs about social issues should have no relevance when one is conducting business.  That elected officials would use their position to punish a citizen’s moral opinion is repugnant and typifies government tyranny.

Dan Cathy’s positions are based on his understanding of his bible and his God.  He is wise enough to understand it is nothing but arrogant to alter the Deity’s plan.  Does that make Dan Cathy a dangerous man and an enemy of the state? 

The answer appears to be yes.  To most leftists tolerance and freedom of speech are rights due everyone except conservative Christians.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged Chick-fil-A boycott, Dan Cathy, family values, gay marriage, gay rights | 3 Comments

More Gun Control Is Not The Answer

Posted on July 21, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

The senseless slaughter of twelve human beings and the wounding of fifty eight in Aurora, Colorado is a stunning tragedy.  It is unimaginable what the victims endured when lunatic James Eagan Holmes entered Century 16 movie theater and unchallenged, opened fire on the defenseless. 

Within hours of the event the usual suspects mounted their soapboxes with predictable baying about gun control offering it as the panacea for gun violence.  New York’s Mayor Bloomberg, always an advocate for banning everything he doesn’t like, pushed again his anti-gun agenda. 

The Big Apple’s tiny mayor said, “. . . .there are so many murders with guns every day. It’s just got to stop”.  No argument here but – almost 100 people die in car crashes each day in the United States.  Bloomberg, not surprisingly, isn’t calling for tougher driving restrictions. 

Not wanting to be left out of the debate, The Washington Post determined, “There is no rational basis for allowing ordinary Americans to purchase assault rifles. They’re not necessary for hunting, and they’re not needed for self defense.”  Thank you Washington Post for determining what ordinary Americans need.

Over at The New York Times, Gail Collins compared gun-control advocates to suffragettes while CNN talk host Piers Morgan tweeted that “America has got to do something about its gun laws.  Now is the time.”

Where is the National Rifle Association in this time of tragedy?  They are respectfully staying quiet other than to offer prayers for the victims, their families and the Aurora community.  Further comment will be withheld until after all facts are known.  The NRA is a class act.

We know where the left stands on gun control but where does America stand?   Support for increased legislation has been steadily declining for many years.  Gallup figures show support in 1990 was quite high at 78 percent.  By 1995 those numbers fell to 62 percent, by 2007 it was down to 51 percent.  Just 44 percent of Americans wanted stricter guns laws in 2011.

The constant calls for more restrictions on gun availability and ownership miss the mark.  Guns don’t execute plans to execute people. 

Canada has very restrictive gun legislation but shootings in Toronto show the futility of passing tougher laws.  More than 200 firearm incidents have been recorded this year. 

Unbelievably, one of the Aurora dead, narrowly escaped gun violence about six weeks ago in Toronto’s Eaton Center, a huge downtown shopping complex.  Jessica Ghawi, 22, was close by but uninjured when bullets killed two in that gunplay.  Jessica was not so blessed Thursday night.

Britain is a shining example of the failure of outlawing guns altogether.  In 1997 the British government passed some of the toughest firearm restrictions in the free world.  The results are less than stellar.

Public record shows by 2001 violent crime more than doubled.  Chances of being mugged in London rose to six times those in New York and 53 percent of burglaries occurred while occupants were at home, compared with 13 percent in the U.S., where burglars fear armed homeowners.  Gun crime in London is so bad that law enforcement struggles to keep up.

More stringent firearm legislation is not the answer.  Guns, in the hands of sane, licensed citizens should not be discouraged.  Had a theater patron or employee been armed when James Holmes began to unleash his evil there would have been at least a chance to reduce the carnage and suffering. 

Absent that defender, the demon not the gun, was free to kill and maim.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged Colorado shooting, gun control, gun violence, James Holmes, NRA | 5 Comments

Will Mitt McCain Blow This Election?

Posted on July 12, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

Voters who view the upcoming November election as the only way to end Barack Obama’s war on America have reason for concern.  The failure of Mitt McCain to take the fight to his opponent is deeply concerning.  It is a replay of 2008 when John McCain refused to take off the gloves.  Mitt McCain, not as aged or tired as his predecessor, seems surprisingly just as naive.  Neither he nor his advisors understand the depths the Obama re-election mob will sink to to win this fight.  And make no mistake.  This is a fight.  There are no rules when Barack Obama is being challenged.  He will say and do anything to cling to power.

Politics is not for gentlemen who play by the rules and believe good always triumphs over evil.  Politics is a blood sport played frequently in the mud sans rules.  When liberals are involved lies can become the norm.  Campaigns sometimes focus on destroying opponents.  If you are Barack Obama and your record is a disaster in every sense of the word, you campaign by obfuscating the issues.  You throw up anything, hoping something sticks.  

So far Obama’s Chicago machine has claimed his Republican challenger is avoiding taxes by hiding money in Swiss bank accounts.  They have attempted to convince voters that Mitt McCain’s time at Bain Capital was invested in selfish capitalist pursuits at the expense of American jobs.  So desperate are they, that a story about slight misadventure during Mitt’s high school days was run up the flag pole, as was a meaningless story about the Romney family pooch being caged and strapped to the roof of the car for a road trip.  None of this means anything as the country slides deeper into a fiscal black hole. 

There are three important, intertwined issues facing voters this November – the economy, jobs and funding health care.  That is where all patriotic eyes must focus.  Mismanagement of any one of these issues will result in the United States of America becoming not dissimilar to Europe. 

Understandably Democrats want to avoid discussing their president’s record.  After three plus years at the helm, he who would be King has weakened the economy, failed to provide a climate for significant job growth and failed to reform America’s health care system independent of government control. 

Seems like the perfect time for a Republican challenger to distinguish himself with an aggressive campaign that ignites American patriotism and steam rolls to victory over those who seek to dismantle and demolish America the Great.  Instead, the voter’s option is mild mannered, uninspiring Mitt “McCain” Romney.

It is time to change strategies.  Romney must take the fight to Obama.  He needs to define Obama rather than the other way around.  Romney must stop limiting himself to repealing ObamaCare and start clearly defining a plan to replace it.  He needs to speak cogently about tax cuts and returning to a job creating, business friendly environment where success is rewarded not punished.  He needs to announce an energy policy that goes into effect on day one.  He must be clear about spending cuts.  Eliminating the Enviromental Protection Agency would be a great starting point.  Romney needs to establish leadership on dealing with illegals.  Deploying sufficient numbers of the National Guard to the US/Mexican border with pursue and detain law enforcement capabilities is a good beginning.  The Republican presidential hopeful must outline his vision for dealing with international problems such as Syria, Iran, North Korea, China and Russia. 

This election is the most important decision Americans will make to decide the future of their country.  With the stakes never higher, Mitt Romney should immediately stop channeling John McCain.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged 2012 race for President, funding health care, Mitt Romney losing to Obama, Republican challenger, Romney and Bain Capital, Romney avoiding taxes, Romney money in Swiss bank accounts | Leave a comment

Keep Your Friends Close and Your Chief Justice Closer

Posted on July 2, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

It did not matter which side of the political divide you were on last Thursday.  Almost no one on foresaw the Supreme Court backing President Obama’s Affordable Health Care Act.  The reason?  Almost no one in their wildest dreams could have predicted the disastrous vote of the United States 17th Chief Justice.

Nominated by President George W. Bush, John Roberts was seen as having a conservative philosophy in his view of law.  Now, the same pundits who predicted the demise of ObamaCare are trying to understand and explain Chief Justice Roberts’ about turn. 

Was he intimidated by the Obama administration?  Is a CBS report claiming Justice Roberts first agreed the individual mandate was unconstitutional but changed his vote to prevent the entire law from being wiped out correct?  Or, is popular and controversial talk radio host Michael Savage on to something?  Savage told his listeners Thursday, that Roberts might have joined liberal Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor because of mind-altering drugs used to treat epileptic seizures.  Savage went back to a New York Times article from the summer of 2007 wherein it was revealed doctors discussed using drugs with troubling side effects (mental slowness and memory loss) to treat the epileptic seizures.

Before you scorn Michael Savage you should know that he predicted during his Tuesday show that Roberts would vote to uphold ObamaCare.  Savage based his prediction on Chief Justice Roberts’ previous siding with the Obama administration over the Arizona immigration law striking down most of it.

The truth is no one can say with certainty what happened in or to the supposedly conservative mind of John Roberts.  His stunning vote meant the 5-4 decision upheld the constitutionality of the president’s Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act creating, as Rush Limbaugh succinctly stated,  “ . . .the largest tax increase in history.”  That we do know.  We also know that this outcome is a disaster for America’s health care and the economy. 

Anyone who believes things will improve under ObamaCare does not understand the simple rudiments of economics.  That is precisely what the Democrats are banking on.  It was current House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi who said, “. . . .but we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it. . . .”  That’s how stupid Democrats believe Americans to be.

ObamaCare will destroy health care in America.  It is top down meaning a Washington bureaucrat determines treatment based on, among other considerations – age, type of disease, lifestyle and economics.  If you’re a mid-seventy, female smoker who drinks and has breast cancer, you can pretty much forget treatment.  It will not be cost effective to treat you.  Here are some inexpensive pain pills.  Now go home and prepare to die.

Under ObamaCare, personal choice or freedom is ripped out of the equation.  The government can tell you what to eat (or not eat) and when and how much to exercise if you want to receive health care.  Your intake of salt, sugar, tobacco, alcohol, fast food, greasy food, junk food and not enough fruit and vegetables will all be factored in to what the bureaucrat, not you and your doctor determine is best for you.

Don’t believe me?  Research Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York city and his efforts to control lifestyle choices.

The economics of ObamaCare will prove to be a nightmare with greater pressure being placed on taxpayers and businesses to fund this massive new entitlement.  The American economy cannot survive the added strain placed on it by Obama’s Wealth Transfer Scheme.  

For his disastrous decision Supreme Court Chief Justice John Glover Roberts Jr. must resign.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged Affordable Health Care Act, Chief Justice John Roberts, ObamaCare and the Americn economy, US Supreme Court decision on Obamacare | Leave a comment

Prepared Or Not – An Economic Crash Is Coming

Posted on May 21, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

It is difficult to read or listen to the news and miss the economic reality of the day.  Global  economies, both large and small are failing.  From Greece teetering on the edge, to Spain, France, Italy and Britain, the story is the same.  Ireland now fears it may need a second bailout. 

Tough times continue in America with painfully high unemployment and deepening debt.  President Hope & Change who promised so much has accomplished so little. 

California, the eighth largest economy in the world, is unofficially bankrupt.  Governor Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown revealed last week that his state deficit zoomed from $9.2 billion to $16 billion in five months.  

Brown’s Legislative Financial Advisor, analyst Mac Taylor, said Friday that Brown is likely underestimating the disaster by another $1 billion.

To add more misery to Californians, the budget gap could widen further.  Taylor estimates that tax revenue may fall by almost $400 million in the fiscal year.

The governor’s solution for this fiscal Armageddon is to cut social services and increase taxes.  Now too late, the former should have been done through draconian slashing years ago.  The latter is simply more of the same stupidity that forces those who can to flee the state further depleting tax revenue. 

It is ridiculous to believe increasing the tax burden on Californians, wealthy or otherwise, will solve this crisis.  California already has the nation’s highest sales tax (that impacts the poor too) and near highest income tax rates.  This is a perfect time to remind Governor Brown of Ronald Reagan’s warning.  President Reagan noted the problem isn’t a lack of revenue.  It is an overabundance of spending.  

That brings us to the “L” word – liberalism – meaning higher taxes and less freedom.  Liberalism is the poison that destroys everything it touches from entire countries and their economies to families, personal incentive and even lives.  There exists not one piece of evidence to suggest that liberal ideology, has ever provided a lasting solution to any problem or crisis.  Quite to the contrary, almost every problem facing man today is made worse when emotionally based liberalism is applied.

The coming global economic collapse is not the fault of the rich.  It was not born out of sound fiscal management, strength of character, faith in God, traditional families or unselfish caring (and tough love) for those who need a hand up rather than a hand out. 

The unfolding and unstoppable worldwide fiscal calamity was planted in the faulty belief that government can meet the needs of the human condition.  That lie begat other lies such as – the wealthy few owe a lot to the many.  It is liberalism acquiescing to the many who  demand larger shares of rewards they did not earn, that has helped force all of us to this precipice.  The constant punishment of success on their behalf by power hungry political thugs has created this actuality where finding a good job makes searching for a needle in a haystack look easy.  Unfairness, the buzzword of the day, is the size of government largesse, not any perceived, uneven playing field slanted in favor of one group over another. 

The only way to reverse the inevitable is for common sense and accountability to break out across the globe.  Those who riot in response to pleas for austerity in Europe are not solving anything.  The takers are the problem and they offer no solution.  They have nothing to give back but more whining.  To suggest otherwise is tantamount to sticking ones head in the sand. 

Those who continue to ignore reality and refuse to accept necessary and severe austerity are in for a world of hurt.  Prepared or not, an economic crash is coming.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged bailouts, depression, economic collapse, recession | 2 Comments

Oprah Covers Her Assets

Posted on March 21, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

The news that Oprah Winfrey pulled the plug on the dying Rosie Show on OWN Network comes as no big surprise.  As expected, O’Donnell was unable to hold the half million train wreck enthusiasts who tuned in at the beginning.  The numbers quickly fell to around 135,000 viewers.  OWN partner, Discovery Communications, reportedly lost $300 million due to overall low ratings for the network.

After five months of hope and change, Oprah was forced to turn both thumbs down on Rosie.  The following day, the axe fell for thirty more OWN employees, another decision made by Winfrey.

At first blush there is nothing newsworthy about thirty-one more jobs lost in the midst of the turbid Obama economy.  At second blush the real story emerges.

Oprah Winfrey, one of the biggest backers of Barack Obama, threw the President, and by extension his policies, under the bus.  When push came to shove, the multi millionaire talk show queen, business woman and TV network executive made a crucial business decision.  Rosie O’Donnell had to go.

In evaluating this decision we have to be clear.  Oprah had options.  She could have chosen a bail out for Rosie and the staff, as President Obama did with General Motors.  OWN could have invested more money into the O’Donnell show to save jobs.  More writers, set designers and make up artists could have been hired.  Ms Winfrey could have cut her own salary back to save her good friend Rosie O from unemployment.  She could have but she did not.

Instead, Ms Winfrey applied common sense business thinking to a failed venture.  With her own money on the line, Oprah instinctively recognized the futility of sinking more money into something the public was not buying.

With the parallel established between Oprah Winfrey protecting her company and President Obama’s responsibility to protect the American economy, we can examine what should and would have happened had there been no car company bailouts.

Since both GM & Chrysler filed for bankruptcy anyway, the Obama administration’s needless manipulation of bankruptcy laws only muddied the natural process, adding at least $20 billion (and likely more) onto the backs of taxpayers.

Had both companies closed their doors, the remaining assets (buildings, parts and equipment) would have been purchased by a group of entrepreneurs;  the experienced, laid off auto workers would have eventually returned to work and stronger, more competitive, determined companies would have risen from the ashes shackle free.

That is the very definition of the term entrepreneurial spirit;  risk taking private investors creating successful businesses, jobs and profit.  All government intervention does is reward failure with tax dollars removing any sense of responsibility from those who engineered the failure.  The incentive to succeed disappears when bailouts exist as safety nets.

The bottom line is neither company needed government aid to resolve its fiscal crises. Restructuring could have occurred under existing bankruptcy guidelines.  The unintended consequences of a bailout means companies that are able to convince the government of their political importance, will bring pressure to bear for more bailouts.  The economy simply cannot absorb this bending of the rules to give control of private enterprise to those who can’t even deliver a budget.

No one with business acumen wants the government to become the lender of choice.  That’s just not its role.

Getting back to OWN Network, it is clearly not being run according to the Barack Obama business manual.  We’ve just witnessed it.  OWN refuses to be that reckless.

A tip of the hat to Oprah for knowing when to drop the hammer and how to cover her assets.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged Oprah Winfrey, OWN Network, Rose O'Donnell fired | 1 Comment

Sandra Fluke Is A One Percenter

Posted on March 10, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

Sandra Fluke, a third year student at Georgetown Law, recently went from obscurity to national prominence.  Testifying at a House Democratic Steering and Policy hearing on women’s health and contraception, the thirty-one year old Fluke, past president of the Georgetown Law Students For Reproductive Justice, argued in defense of the Affordable Care Act Contraceptive Coverage Regulation. 

In plain english, Ms. Fluke believes the federal government should force insurance companies to cover contraceptive services and products for women.  She wants to wrap her hand in the government glove, shove it right up your pocketbook and grab all the loose coin she can find.  God bless her short sighted, liberal mind.

I recently wrote on the myth that government should fund health care.  As a fiscal conservative I understand why government must do less not more.  Miss Fluke, unfortunately, cares not about recessions, depressions or personal responsibility.  Like every taker, she sees every producer as her never ending source of free stuff. 

So how far can we push living off the toil of others?  If this junior legal eagle is correct, if government should be the ultimate arbiter of who pays for what and who deserves to be coddled from cradle to grave, then let’s damn well go all the way.  Give liberals exactly what they want providing they agree to live with the consequences. 

Birth control and health care are just the beginning.  Who can argue that a roof over your head is asking too much?  Everyone needs sustenance so let’s make basic, good food a right for everyone.  We are talking fairness after all. 

Contraception, health care, housing and food are a good start but we can do better.  I say put everyone who is currently unemployed on the government payroll at a decent wage.  Unemployment – solved. 

A job requires transportation.  Bus and subway tokens (and cars if necessary) should be deemed essential and therefore supplied by the government.  Students deserve equal consideration so they too are owed a government funded free ride.   

If fairness and equality for all is how we measure our goodness as a society then my proposals have merit.  The fact that everything I’ve suggested is ridiculous and economically impossible is irrelevant.  Remember, I’m thinking as a liberal so emotion replaces common sense.  The calamitous outcome for our economy, way of life, individuality, strength and future must be ignored because narcissistic liberalism is about immediate gratification and the constant struggle for fairness. 

We need to be honest.  The horizon for liberals extends no farther than I, me, mine and now.  Citizens who care about the future of the country understand the disastrous result of depleting the treasury in the name of manufactured fairness and socially engineered equality. 

Adam Carolla, media personality, author and supporter of limited government said during a no spin interview with Bill O’Reilly that the desire to redistribute wealth begins with envy.  The envy transforms into shame from not having what you envy.  The shame turns to anger at whom you envy. 

The liberal solution is to use legislation to punish those with more, forcing them to share with those having less.

The problem for liberals is their lack of credibility.  Sandra Fluke attends Georgetown Law on a Public Interest Scholarship but would have you believe she cannot afford nine dollars a month for contraception.  How then is she able to afford spring break in California with her boyfriend? 

We have to talk money here.  The starting annual salary for a graduate from Georgetown Law is about $160,000.  With that kind of bread on the table in this economy, I see little need to feel sorry for these elite, well positioned women.  I see even less need to fund their birth control. 

It’s time to get real.  Sandra Fluke is a one percenter.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged birth control costs, contraception, Georgetown Law School, Sandra Fluke | Leave a comment

Health Care Is Not A Right

Posted on February 20, 2012 by Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!

Unfortunately, in politics, great campaign promises are not always kept.  In the current Republican Presidential race, each hopeful has pledged to repeal ObamaCare, a job killing, tax & spend behemoth entitlement.  If that promise is broken or, if President Iconoclast is reelected,  the final nail will seal the coffin containing the remains of the US economy.

That must not happen. 

It is disturbing to see the proportion of voters in favor of the federal government taking over this 1/5th of the US economy.  They cannot understand anyone wanting to repeal ObamaCare.  Mostly left wing and idealistic, these voters turn a blind eye to the pitfalls of increasing dependency on government at a time when drastic spending cuts are imperative to economic survival. 

Many ask,”Doesn’t everyone deserve good health care?”  No they do not. 

What everyone deserves is the right to choose their own path.  They deserve the opportunity to succeed,  to keep the rewards of their labor and to avoid funding entitlements based on what others incorrectly believe they deserve. 

By what justification is deservedness established?  Should one not first accomplish something of value prior to making fiscal demands on fellow citizens?  Just being born in the right country is nothing more than pure luck.  It falls well short of being worthy of anything but the opportunity to try.

Look at the wording of the question – Doesn’t everyone deserve good health care?  It is actually a statement disguised as a question.  The implication is that to disagree makes you selfish, mean spirited and certainly not thinking like a proper Socialist.  The second implication is that good health care comes only from government.  That is a canard.  The debate is actually not about health care.  It is about how to pay for it. 

Those supporting big government care are mainly interested in avoiding the bill.  They willingly ignore government’s miserable track record in business.  Amtrak, the Post Office, Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare – each on financial life support and every one an attempt by government to operate as would a business.  Further, government health care is always more costly due to the bureaucracy required to run it.  And how do we ignore the elimination of competition, so vital to cost control? 

There are two major issues directly impacting medical costs in America, federal restrictions on insurance companies doing business across state lines and the out of control litigious nature of Americans.  Legal reforms are needed now to bar many of the huge settlements driving up insurance costs for doctors and hospitals.  Frivolous lawsuits must be stopped.  That requires standing up to the lawyers lobby.  But who will?

For those looking north to the Canadian system the news is not good.  In Canada, economic realities are not bowing to entitlement ideology.  Aging baby boomers and dwindling resources are forcing Canadian provinces to cut health care costs.  As with any socialist system, Canada’s health care Utopia is collapsing under its own weight.  In 2009, Canadian provinces spent 40% of their budgets ($183 billion) on health care.  Ontario will reportedly spend 70% of its budget on health care by 2020 barring serious change.  

Dependency  is unsustainable.

Like it or not Canadians are looking at a new flat health tax, a fee per doctor visit, means testing and more private funding for some medical procedures now covered by the government system.

America, take note.  Canadians are beginning to understand.  If everyone deserves good health care, everyone must be willing to pay for it.

Rate this:

Posted in US political & social commentary | Tagged government spending, health care, Obamacare, repealing ObamaCare | Leave a comment
← Older posts
Newer posts →
  • Recent Posts

    • Who Really Cherry Picks The News?
    • Free Speech Not Welcome At UC Berkeley – Growing Problem
    • Democrat Blame Game Must Include The Candidate
    • Why Trump Won
    • Hillary Could Soon Be A Felon
  • Recent Comments

    Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!'s avatarKaye Richard - When… on Progressivism and The Emotiona…
    Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right!'s avatarKaye Richard - When… on Trump – Lesser of Two Ev…
    Invisible Mikey's avatarInvisible Mikey on Trump – Lesser of Two Ev…
    Crystal's avatarCrystal on Progressivism and The Emotiona…
    Edward's avatarEdward on Are Smaller Attacks The New…
  • Archives

    • September 2017
    • February 2017
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • July 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
  • Categories

    • US political & social commentary
  • Meta

    • Create account
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
Kaye Richard – When I Write I'm Right
Blog at WordPress.com.
Kaye Richard – When I Write I'm Right
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Kaye Richard - When I Write I'm Right
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...