Mitt Romney’s choice of Paul Ryan as his VP running mate turned out to be a brilliant decision. Ask any of the estimated 10,000 thrilled supporters who attended Ryan’s return to his native Wisconsin on Sunday. The new candidate was so moved by the enthusiasm of the throngs that he showed a moment of grateful emotion.
Within hours of Saturday’s announcement, renewed hope was felt by many previously disappointed with Gov. Romney. His failure to be more forthcoming on plans to reverse the Obamanation of America won him no friends.
By Monday the pulse of a cross section of voters was taken. Top pollster John Zogby (JZ Analytics), showed Romney/Ryan and Obama/Biden tied at 46%, an impressive bump up for team Romney. Just days earlier many polls had President Obama ahead by 5 percentage points.
A nationwide phone survey conducted by Scott Rasmussen (Rasmussen Reports), put Paul Ryan’s favorable numbers at 50% of likely voters up from 39% before winning the VP nomination. The poll further found over half (29%) of the 50% view Ryan as Very Favorable.
The Wisconsin congressman was certainly the right choice from a strong field of contenders. At 42, the handsome, athletic, Tea Party favorite brings hope to those who were reticent to get behind presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney. On personality alone he scores points over the less exciting former governor. The two men like and respect each other which makes business savvy Romney more likely to listen to the politically intuitive congressman.
Ryan is the only candidate who can talk about America’s problems, offer sound solutions and do so without sounding partisan. He has that rare ability to present himself as any other hard working, deeply concerned American who foresees the future under a second Obama term. What stares back at Ryan and all patriotic Americans is the demise, by design, of a once great nation.
The Miami University (Ohio) graduate and married father of three brings a wealth of experience to the ticket. He has ably represented Wisconsin’s 1st congressional district for thirteen years and maintains his position as Chairman of the House Budget Committee. His political experience includes time as a senatorial aide, legislative director and a speech writer for former vice presidential nominee Jack Kemp (NY).
Ryan’s focus with the House Budget Committee is on privatizing Social Security to prevent insolvency, introducing a voucher program to replace Medicare (for those 55 and under) and making the states responsible for Medicaid and food stamps funded by block grants from the feds.
Paul Ryan describes himself as, “as pro-life as a person gets.” He opposes same sex marriage and would impose criminal penalty on doctors who perform partial birth abortions.
A strong defender of gun rights, Congressman Ryan believes in a licensed gun owner’s right to carry/conceal in every state if licensed in one state. He would ban flag burning, end federal funding of National Public Radio and he supports energy self-sufficiency for America.
As a devout Catholic, Paul Ryan believes in values that strengthen the family. As a strong conservative he believes in ideas that will strengthen the country.
Together Mitt Romney & Paul Ryan have a message. There is no better time than now to deliver it.
Low Information Voters
“It’s not that our liberal friends are ignorant, it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.” – Ronald Reagan
When Reagan referred to “our liberal friends” he identified a segment of seriously misguided, under informed, self centered voters who make bad decisions in the voting booth. Today they’re increasingly known as low information voters.
How big is their impact? Last November over 61 million low information voters granted President Barack Kevorkian, four more years to practice voodoo medicine on their terminally ill economy. Clearly these Einsteins aren’t troubled by obscene debt and deficit numbers or painfully high unemployment.
Typically left of center, low information voters actually know very little about the issues but see their limited knowledge as encyclopedic. Health care is a good example.
LI voters almost achieve orgasm over ObamaCare yet few can explain, for example, the medical device tax and why this jobs killer is considered by the industry to be anti-technology. Explain it? They’ve never even heard of it.
Low information voters were willingly hoodwinked by the presidential canard that insuring another 30 million Americans under ObamaCare could be accomplished without increasing costs. That claim defies even simple logic but the President poured the Kool-Aid and the sycophants drank it. Now let’s see these nanny state proponents explain the Society of Actuaries (SAC) just released numbers showing a 32% cost increase for claims on individual health policies under ObamaCare.
Insurance rates are based on costs. That 32% will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher premiums. According to President Obama, costs were to go down under the Affordable Care Act, but the SAC report predicts double digit increases in most states. It outlines examples of higher costs by 2017 for individual coverage of 62% in California, 80% for Ohio & Wisconsin, over 20 % in Florida and 67% in Maryland. Oops! Up doesn’t seem like down to me.
Ask the low information voter to explain the rising numbers of private practise doctors closing up shop because they can’t cover expenses under reduced Medicare payouts.
Dr. Mark Seigel, Associate Professor of Medicine at New York University School of Medicine, says a cardiologist who made $560 to read an echocardiogram will make $280 under ObamaCare. Sound like a good deal? Of course not, but when you’re addicted to the government teat, you tend not to sweat little things like how nothing is free or that government must first take before it can give. Low information voters never dig that deep.
Gay marriage and gun control are the latest causes spurring LI voters to action through emotion without knowledge. Pandering politicians mixed with media angst and hysteria quickly coalesced low information voters in a bellicose call to action on both fronts.
Telling the Deity He got it wrong on marriage and restricting rights to self-protection are not positions born of brilliance.
Last November’s presidential election revealed a troubling reality. Over 51% of voters thought it smarter not to reject failure but to embrace it.
That speaks directly to the intelligence quotient level of the low information voter.
Rate this: